Loading...



Search

Nuclear Physics - Deducing The Mass Formula Of The Nucleus

There is more complexity to the mass formula of the nucleus than just a simple linear dependence on the total number of nucleons which are protons and neutrons. Let us call it \(A\) . Readily at first , there seems to be the kinds of energies mentioned below that should play the key role:

  1. Bulk energy: This is the term studied above, and saturation implies that the energy is proportional to \(B_{\text{bulk}}=\alpha A\).
  2. Surface energy: Nucleons at the surface of the nuclear sphere have less neighbors, and should feel less attraction. Since the surface area goes with \(R^2\), we find \(B_{\text{surface}}=-\beta A\).
  3. Pauli or symmetry energy: nucleons are fermions (will be discussed later). That means that they cannot occupy the same states, thus reducing the binding. This is found to be proportional to \(B_{\text{symm}}=-\gamma (N/2-Z/2)^2/A^2\).
  4. Coulomb energy: protons are charges and they repel. The average distance between is related to the radius of the nucleus, the number of interaction is roughly \(Z^2\) (or \(Z(Z-1)\)). We have to include the term \(B_{\text{Coul}}=-\epsilon Z^2/A\).
765px-Liquid_drop_model.svg.png
Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): Illustration of the terms of the semi-empirical mass formula in the liquid drop model of the atomic nucleus. (CC BY-SA; Daniel FR).

Taking all this together we fit the formula

\[B(A,Z) = \alpha A - \beta A^{2/3} - \gamma (A/2-Z)^2A^{-1} - \epsilon Z^2 A^{-1/3} \label{eq:mass1}\]

to all know nuclear binding energies with \(A\geq 16\) (the formula is not so good for light nuclei). The fit results are given in Table \(\PageIndex{1}\).

Table \(\PageIndex{1}\): Fit of masses to Equation \ref{eq:mass1}.
parameter value
\(\alpha\) 15.36 MeV
\(\beta\) 16.32 MeV
\(\gamma\) 90.45 MeV
\(\epsilon\) 0.6928 MeV
mass_form1.png
Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\): Difference between fitted binding energies and experimental values (color), as a function of \(N\) and \(Z\).

In Table \(\PageIndex{1}\) we show how well this fit works. There remains a certain amount of structure, see below, as well as a strong difference between neighbouring nuclei. This is due to the superfluid nature of nuclear material: nucleons of opposite momenta tend to anti-align their spins, thus gaining energy. The solution is to add a pairing term to the binding energy,

\[B_{\text{pair}} = \begin{cases} A^{-1/2} & \text{for $N$ odd, $Z$ odd}\\ - A^{-1/2} & \text{for $N$ even, $Z$ even}\end{cases}\]

The results including this term are significantly better, even though all other parameters remain at the same position (Table \(\PageIndex{2}\)). Taking all this together we fit the formula

\[B(A,Z) = \alpha A - \beta A^{2/3} - \gamma (A/2-Z)^2A^{-1} - \delta B_{\text{pair}}(A,Z)-\epsilon Z^2 A^{-1/3} \label{eq:mass2}\]

Table \(\PageIndex{2}\): Fit of masses to Equation \ref{eq:mass2}.
parameter value
\(\alpha\) 15.36 MeV
\(\beta\) 16.32 MeV
\(\gamma\) 90.46 MeV
\(\delta\) 11.32 MeV
\(\epsilon\) 0.6929 MeV
152477155170608508.png
Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\): \(B/A\) versus \(A\), mass formula subtracted.




Are you a technological scientist?

Do you want to send us your hypothesis composition or
a piece of writing?
Go to:

→Submissions


Subscription For News Letter


High-Energy Physics
Nuclear Physics
QuantumElectroDynamics
QuantumChromoDynamics
Quantum Gravity
Quantum Optics
Quantum Computing
Quantum Consciousness
Quantum Biology
Research Papers
Documentaries
E-Books
About Us
Contact Us
Researches
GDPR Privacy Policy
CCPA Privacy Policy
Editorial Policy
Website Accessibility
Terms of use



PRESS & PUBLIC RELATIONS

Pavan Modi
QuantXcer
Hyderabad, India
Email: pavan.modi.mrk@quantxcer.com